This is very normal. There is a quote of Max Planck that use very often in this blog:
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it."
Quantum mechanics has been around for a century and it became more and more popular in the 70's when scientists have better tools in experimenting with it. Along came the spiritual side that discusses whether really consciousness causes collapse or not and the famous law of attraction.
Recently, I visit their blogs very often and observe their approach to the intention manifestation model. Tina Su, among them is the fastest who learned and adapted to it. Why? because the youngest among them (28) and like it happens with the new generation's adaptation on computers, new generation also adapts to the idea of "thoughts become things". They are born into it.
If you look closely to Steve Pavlina's articles and posts about the law of attraction, he clearly states that any positive thought can bring you success while any negative thought can bring you limitations on your success, if not a complete failure. Yet, on several articles, I can clearly see that he limits himself too.
This limiting himself comes out of the habit of seeing the world as it is there. Even an intelligent and creative person like Steve Pavlina can come across with limitations through his thinking and perceptions.
I have a great respect for him and there are a lot of things I have learned from him and of course this is not a criticism of him. I just want to make clear that our thinking habits are really very determined on how we do things in our lives.
Now I am thinking of the future. How would todays five year olds would assess the law of attraction and intention manifestation model in the future, let's say around 2020's and 2030's?
It looks like that the word miracle will have new meanings when we arrive there.
Posts
